Roux Blog

Are You Prepared for Stricter PCB Regulations?

Posted on Jul 31, 2014 1:11:00 PM

Engineered natural Systems

Are You Prepared for Stricter PCB Regulations?

PCBs are one of the leading causes of water quality impairment in the US and thus, have become a target for the development of Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs).  Many states have developed or are in the process of developing PCB TMDLs including California, Virginia, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey.  The recent surge in TMDL evaluations of impacted watersheds, in conjunction with the extremely low level PCB analytical method (Method 1668) being utilized in the studies, is leading to significantly more stringent PCB discharge limitations for many facilities.

What does this mean to you?

Facilities with historic industrial use may have residual PCBs present in soil, resulting in low level PCB detections in process water and stormwater runoff. As part of the development and implementation of TMDLs, these facilities are required to perform initial testing using the low-level analysis techniques, track down PCB sources, and ultimately implement control measures including treatment systems and best management practices (BMPs) to decrease PCB discharges. 

Roux helps clients understand the challenges posed by the recent TMDLs and the lower PCB detection limits.  Our work includes facilitating initial sampling during TMDL development, preparing Pollution Minimization Plans (PMPs) that control PCB reduction costs, and designing efficient and innovative Natural Media Filter (NMF) treatment systems to sequester PCBs from facility discharge.  Roux has been successful in navigating all aspects of the TMDL process and have received regulatory approval for the installation of our NMF technology as a best available technology specific to the removal of PCBs from stormwater runoff.


Schedule a Brownbag / Technical Presentation Tailored to your Needs:

If you want to learn more about the above topic or are just interested in hearing more about our Engineered Natural Systems (ENS®) services, click on the button below and we will be happy to customize a brown bag / technical presentation to suit your needs.

Brownbag for:: Engineered Natural Systems  (ENS)

Topics: ENS, Engineered Natural Systems

What Do Insurers Need to Know After the May 2014 NJ Remedial Investigations Deadline?

Posted on Jul 30, 2014 1:03:46 PM


INS-Banner

What Do Insurers Need to Know After the New Jersey Remedial Investigations Deadline?

The pace of Remedial Investigations (RI) and Remedial Actions (RA) in New Jersey has quickened in the first five years of the Licensed Site Remediation Professional (LSRP) program. This was the intent of the Site Remediation Reform Act (SRRA), which was enacted in March 2009 and created the LSRP program. For many Responsible Parties (RPs) and their insurers, this has allowed for more streamlined and cost-effective investigations and remedial actions, albeit with faster rates of spending in the short term.

However, a large number of sites have not met one or both of the mandatory time frames established by SRRA and may soon be the subject of enforcement by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP).

  • May 7, 2012 - the first Mandatory Timeframe in SRRA – was the date by which all sites (with very limited exclusions) were required to hire an LSRP to oversee the remediation.  As of June 2014 (two years post-deadline), the NJDEP website lists over 1700 sites which have not yet engaged an LSRP
  • May 7, 2014 - the second Mandatory Timeframe specified in SRRA – was the date that sites with spills/releases dating prior to May 7, 1999 (more than 15 years old) had to complete the Remedial Investigation.
On January 17, 2014, Governor Christie signed P.L.2013, c.283, authorizing a two-year extension of the RI deadline to those RPs/sites that complied with other applicable requirements, on the condition that they post financial assurance for the remaining cost of RI completion.  According to the NJDEP, a total of 1239 sites/RPs applied for and received the RI extension to May 7, 2016.  
 
NJDEP has not yet published statistics on the large number of sites that completed and submitted RIs in the days approaching the deadline, nor the number of sites (including many of the 1700 sites with no LSRP) who missed the important RI deadline without obtaining an extension.

According to SRRA, sites that miss these Mandatory Timeframes are automatically subject to Direct Oversight, which means:
  • The LSRP must report directly to an assigned NJDEP Case Manager;
  • The NJDEP Case Manager selects the remedy; and
  • The RP must conduct a cost review within 60 days and then post a Remediation Funding Source (RFS), in the form of cash in a trust fund (only), for the full cost of the remediation.
The NJDEP is still working out its own enforcement priorities and procedures.  However, as these are statutory deadlines, NJDEP’s hands are tied as to its ability to remain flexible.  It remains to be seen how the requirement to post the RFS will affect insurers, in terms of both ultimate costs and timing of demands for payment.
While we are past the first major RI milestone for the oldest sites, almost all sites in the program prior to March 1, 2010 have upcoming Regulatory and Mandatory Timeframes for both the RI and RA.
  • In addition to the May 7, 2016 deadline for pre-1999 sites with the RI extension, RI deadlines range from March 1, 2015 (RI Regulatory Timeframe for soil-only and select other sites) to March 1, 2019 (Mandatory Timeframe for sites with groundwater and other media).
  • RA Mandatory Timeframes range from as soon as the May 7, 2017 Mandatory Timeframe for remediation of pre-1999 soil-only sites (May 7, 2019 for other media) to a March 1, 2024, RA Mandatory Timeframe for groundwater cases initiated prior to March 1, 2010.
The RA deadlines have received much less attention than the RI deadlines and are quickly approaching for the pre-1999 sites.  Like the statutory RI timeframe, the May 2017 and May 2019 Mandatory RA Timeframes for pre-1999 sites cannot be extended without legislative action. The NJDEP has stated that sites that received an extension to the May 2014 RI deadline did not receive an extension to the 2017 or 2019 RA deadline.
 
These various Regulatory and Mandatory Timeframes result in virtually every New Jersey site having applicable Regulatory and Mandatory Timeframes for both RI and RA over the next ten years. Considering the number of years it took to accumulate this backlog, the current fast pace of remediation will need to be maintained for the foreseeable future. 
 
For information regarding New Jersey remediation timeframes and other LSRP-related information, or if you want to learn about Roux Associates Insurance services, click below and we will be happy to customize a brownbag / technical presentation to suit your needs.
Request for More Information: Insurance Support Services 

Roux Associates, Inc. is a professional services firm providing a broad range of consulting and project management services to solve complex environmental issues associated with air, water and land.  We have been providing these services to an impressive list of Fortune 500 and public sector clients nationwide for over 30 years through six offices, which are located in California, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey and New York.

Dr. Adam Love to Present on Stable Isotope Fingerprinting

Posted on Jul 17, 2014 2:19:00 PM

describe the image

New Tool Validated for Vapor Intrusion Litigation:
Stable Isotope Fingerprinting

The increased regulatory focus on vapor intrusion has led to the development of better tools for determining the source(s) of VOCs in indoor air. One such tool is compound specific isotope analysis (CSIA). CSIA is a well-established method for fingerprinting of pure chemicals and groundwater contamination. CSIA compares molecular structures between two samples of the same material in order to determine the likelihood that they originated from the same source. While this approach has been applied to VOCs in indoor air, there has been some hesitation to use it in a litigation context given the lack of an established methodology. However, in the last month or so, two major developments have occurred that pave the way for utilizing this methodology for litigation related to vapor intrusion source attribution.

This presentation will provide an overview of typically vapor intrusion source attribution issues, then review and discuss the lessons learned and implication from:

  • The 9th Circuit court, in City of Pomona v. SQM North America Corporation, issued 5/2/14, which held that stable isotope analysis (for perchlorate in this case) meets the Daubert standard for admissibility.

  • The US Department of Defense’s environmental technology demonstration and validation program, ESTCP, issued a report titled “Use of Compound-Specific Stable Isotope Analysis to Distinguish between Vapor Intrusion and Indoor Sources of VOCs”.

These developments facilitate the use of isotope analysis techniques that can be effectively and efficiently employed to reduce uncertainty and answer questions that otherwise would be extremely difficult and costly to address.

If you are interested in learning more about the above topic, contact Roux via the button below to request or schedule a technical brown bag tailored to your needs.

Request For More Info

Topics: Litigation Support, California, vapor Intrusion, Stable Isotope Fingerprinting

NYC DEP Announced $6 million Available for 2014 Green Infrastructure Grant Program

Posted on Jul 9, 2014 5:30:00 PM

Engineered Natural Systems

New York City Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is offering $6 million in grant funding for green infrastructure projects that manage stormwater runoff from private property. Private property owners in the combined sewer areas of all five boroughs of New York City are eligible to apply. The fall due date for applications is October 21, 2014.

What is Green Infrastructure?

Green infrastructure systems mimic natural processes to manage and treat stormwater runoff.  Examples include rain gardens, green roofs, porous pavement, bioswales, and treatment wetlands.  These systems offer multiple benefits including:

  • Improving water quality and public health
  • Passive operations resulting in low maintenance
  • Improved aesthetics
  • Creation of habitat
  • Strengthening of coastal resiliency

Roux Associates are nationally recognized experts and leaders in the design and implementation of sustainable Engineered Natural Systems (ENS®) treatment technologies such as Constructed Treatment Wetlands (CTW), Phytotechnologies, and other passive technologies (e.g., permeable reactive barriers and natural media filtration).  Our award-winning ENS® technologies have been used to treat groundwater and surface water contamination, stormwater runoff, contaminated soils and sediments, landfill leachate, and industrial/municipal wastewaters.

nyc_environmental_protection_agency-resized-600

NYC DEP Online Application

View the online application for the New York City Department of Environmental Protection's green Infrastructure Grant Program here.

 

 

ENS-NYC_Green_Infrastructure-1Green Infrastructure Grant Program FAQ's

Concerned about stormwater management on your site? Looking to increase the resiliency of your infrastructure?  For more information or to see if your site qualifies, click here.

 

 

ENS-NYC-Green_Infrastructure-1Engineered Natural Systems (ENS®)

To learn more about Roux Associates low-cost “Green” ENS® treatment technologies click here.

 

 

Did you miss the DEP's workshop on eligibilty criteria?

Roux Associates attended the event and can help answer your questions or if you want to learn more about our Engineered Natural Systems (ENS®) services, click on the button and we will be happy to customize a brown bag / technical presentation to suit your needs.

Brownbag for:: Engineered Natural Systems  (ENS)

Topics: NYC DEP, Green Infrastructure Grant Program, treatment wetlands, New York City, Constructed Treatment Wetlands